Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Radulovacki results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, with Blind-Spot Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (5,286 of 43,505 speakers). This Ryan Radulovacki is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Ryan Radulovacki
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠88%Ryan Radulovacki (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510087.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.7%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos