Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rotterdam Film Festival results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Recency Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 18 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (4,827 of 39,751 speakers). This Rotterdam Film Festival is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Rotterdam Film Festival
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠88%Rotterdam Film Festival (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510087.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos18 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos