Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rose results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Halo Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 46 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (5,388 of 45,101 speakers). This Rose is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Rose
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠89%Rose (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos