Speaker summary
89%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roman Gushchin results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 252 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (7,278 of 28,364 speakers). This Roman Gushchin is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Roman Gushchin
Speaker details