Speaker summary
â 89%1 analyzed article/video105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rolando Salgado results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 245 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 83.3% and a BS Rank of â 83% (5,065 of 28,364 speakers). This Rolando Salgado is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Rolando Salgado
Speaker details