Speaker summary
68%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roger Stone results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Confirmation Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,717 of 38,887 speakers). This Roger Stone is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Roger Stone
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
68%Roger Stone (selected)50%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos