Speaker summary
49% 12 analyzed articles/videos 342.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roger Marshall results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 68 hits . Analysis detected 587.435 faulty-reasoning hits from 342.667 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 8% (37,127 of 40,167 speakers). This Roger Marshall is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Roger Marshall
Speaker details
Total words: 342.667
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 7.7% BS Score12 analyzed videos342.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst