Speaker summary
60%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robin Pam results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Red Herring, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 64.9% saturation with 65.25 hits. Analysis detected 231.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (13,748 of 28,364 speakers). This Robin Pam is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Robin Pam
Speaker details