Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rivkin results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (22,380 of 39,194 speakers). This Rivkin is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Rivkin
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠43%Rivkin (selected)26%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
25.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 30.6%30.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.1%16.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos