Speaker summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos1,195.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rigved Tadwalkar results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 1,094.795 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,195.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (41,914 of 42,369 speakers). This Rigved Tadwalkar is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Rigved Tadwalkar
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠2%Rigved Tadwalkar (selected)4%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 1,195.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos