Speaker summary
91%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Revolving Door Project results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,595 of 38,377 speakers). This Revolving Door Project is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Revolving Door Project
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
88%Revolving Door Project (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos