Speaker summary
75%2 analyzed articles/videos164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 596.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (13,405 of 28,364 speakers). This Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Speaker details