Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regina Asmutis-Silvia results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, False Dilemma, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (4,736 of 22,811 speakers). This Regina Asmutis-Silvia is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Regina Asmutis-Silvia
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠80%Regina Asmutis-Silvia (selected)75%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos