Speaker summary
72%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randle and Marlyn results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 60.5% saturation with 15.721 hits. Analysis detected 24.721 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 80.2% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,495 of 23,450 speakers). This Randle and Marlyn is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Randle and Marlyn
Speaker details