Speaker summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video37.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randall Kallinen results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 15.75 hits. Analysis detected 71.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (21,667 of 40,353 speakers). This Randall Kallinen is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Randall Kallinen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠47%Randall Kallinen (selected)28%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.3% percentile
27.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos