Speaker summary
34%7 analyzed articles/videos351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Integrity Project results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 864.984 faulty-reasoning hits from 351 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.2% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,708 of 28,280 speakers). This Public Integrity Project is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Public Integrity Project
Speaker details
Total words: 351
Article count: 7
Authors