Speaker summary
89%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These public defenders results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Negativity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 18 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 88% (3,485 of 28,364 speakers). This public defenders is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
public defenders
Speaker details