Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video13 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professional Fiduciaries Bureau results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Burden of Proof, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 13 faulty-reasoning hits from 13 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (4,373 of 37,901 speakers). This Professional Fiduciaries Bureau is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Professional Fiduciaries Bureau
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠89%Professional Fiduciaries Bureau (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 13
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos