Speaker summary
91%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These presidential assistant results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ad Hominem, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,329 of 37,709 speakers). This presidential assistant is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
presidential assistant
Speaker details