Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pierre Paul-Hus results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (4,286 of 37,945 speakers). This Pierre Paul-Hus is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Pierre Paul-Hus
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠89%Pierre Paul-Hus (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos