Speaker summary
58%1 analyzed article/video191.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philip Chidel results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Recency Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 114.605 hits. Analysis detected 398.427 faulty-reasoning hits from 191.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,202 of 28,364 speakers). This Philip Chidel is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Philip Chidel
Speaker details