Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Wahba results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 78.9% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 286 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of 58% (12,166 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil Wahba is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Phil Wahba
Speaker details