Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video22 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Spencer results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Self-Serving Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 66 faulty-reasoning hits from 22 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,433 of 18,945 speakers). This Phil Spencer is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Phil Spencer
Speaker details