Speaker summary
71%4 analyzed articles/videos258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Scott results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 68.259 hits. Analysis detected 283.064 faulty-reasoning hits from 258 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,943 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil Scott is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Phil Scott
Speaker details