Speaker summary
90%2 analyzed articles/videos189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Mendelson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 467.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 189 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 45% and a BS Rank of 61% (9,509 of 23,905 speakers). This Phil Mendelson is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Phil Mendelson
Speaker details