Speaker summary
ā 90%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Bacerra results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 86 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 88% (3,171 of 26,196 speakers). This Phil Bacerra is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Phil Bacerra
Speaker details