Speaker summary
79%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Whoriskey results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Appeal to Authority, and Primacy Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 46.667 hits. Analysis detected 348.167 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.9% and a BS Rank of 32% (19,342 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter Whoriskey is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Peter Whoriskey
Speaker details