Speaker summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Ticktin results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 135 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (25,903 of 45,123 speakers). This Peter Ticktin is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Peter Ticktin
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠43%Peter Ticktin (selected)25%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 135
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
25.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos135 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.0%20.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Burden of Proof: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos