Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Salk results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Anecdotal, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (4,014 of 35,288 speakers). This Peter Salk is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Peter Salk
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠89%Peter Salk (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos