Speaker summary
41%1 analyzed article/video103.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter McLaughlin results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 226 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of 53% (13,566 of 28,364 speakers). This Peter McLaughlin is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Peter McLaughlin
Speaker details