Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Docter results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Circular Reasoning, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 73.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 205.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,662 of 28,364 speakers). This Pete Docter is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Pete Docter
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠63%Pete Docter (selected)47%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos