Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These People Power Party results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 186 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (4,213 of 37,801 speakers). This People Power Party is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
People Power Party
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠89%People Power Party (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos