Speaker summary
82%2 analyzed articles/videos219.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Penny Nance results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 73.8% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,150.964 faulty-reasoning hits from 219.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (27,902 of 45,144 speakers). This Penny Nance is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Penny Nance
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
39%Penny Nance (selected)23%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 219.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
22.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos219.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 73.8%73.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 33.7%33.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.9%24.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 73.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 26.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 33.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos