Speaker summary
91%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Smith results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 89% (3,754 of 32,617 speakers). This Paul Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Paul Smith
Speaker details