Speaker summary
61%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Schroeder results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 26 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 88% (3,016 of 24,904 speakers). This Paul Schroeder is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Paul Schroeder
Speaker details