Speaker summary
79%1 analyzed article/video61.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Hill results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 164 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (6,775 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul Hill is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Paul Hill
Speaker details