Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video12 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Edmondson results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 12 hits. Analysis detected 12 faulty-reasoning hits from 12 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,172 of 37,798 speakers). This Paul Edmondson is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Paul Edmondson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
89%Paul Edmondson (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 12
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos