Speaker summary
83%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Dacre results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Horn Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 68.5% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 423.417 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (10,430 of 28,364 speakers). This Paul Dacre is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Paul Dacre
Speaker details