Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Clancy's attorney results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 34 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,881 of 23,550 speakers). This Patrick Clancy's attorney is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Patrick Clancy's attorney
Speaker details