Speaker summary
80%1 analyzed article/video95 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pasadena City College results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Status Quo Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 59% saturation with 56.056 hits. Analysis detected 132.056 faulty-reasoning hits from 95 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of 45% (21,943 of 39,815 speakers). This Pasadena City College is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Pasadena City College
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
45%Pasadena City College (selected)27%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 95
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
26.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos95 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 59.0%59.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 59.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos