Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pam Salamone results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ad Hominem, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 29 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,589 of 21,043 speakers). This Pam Salamone is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Pam Salamone
Speaker details