Speaker summary
90%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pacific Legal Foundation results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Halo Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 89% (3,255 of 28,364 speakers). This Pacific Legal Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Pacific Legal Foundation
Speaker details