Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These organization: Community watch teams results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (4,134 of 38,926 speakers). This organization: Community watch teams is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
organization: Community watch teams
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠90%organization: Community watch teams (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 20
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos