Speaker summary
91%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Office of Public Accountability results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Confirmation Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,474 of 20,825 speakers). This Office of Public Accountability is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Office of Public Accountability
Speaker details