Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video22 analyzed words
BS Summary: These O’Donoghue results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 22 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (4,259 of 41,099 speakers). This O’Donoghue is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
O’Donoghue
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠90%O’Donoghue (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 22
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510089.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos22 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos