Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NYU’s Stern Center results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 35 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,266 of 19,119 speakers). This NYU’s Stern Center is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
NYU’s Stern Center
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠89%NYU’s Stern Center (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 35
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos