Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video98.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norman Vincent Peale results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 26 faulty-reasoning hits from 98.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (39,557 of 44,452 speakers). This Norman Vincent Peale is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Norman Vincent Peale
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠11%Norman Vincent Peale (selected)10%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 98.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos98.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.2%9.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos