Speaker summary
91%1 analyzed article/video121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noam Segal results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 461 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.6% and a BS Rank of 64% (10,457 of 28,364 speakers). This Noam Segal is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Noam Segal
Speaker details