Speaker summary
71%1 analyzed article/video77 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Edwardsen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Straw Man, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 72.7% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 189 faulty-reasoning hits from 77 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.4% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,004 of 19,215 speakers). This Noah Edwardsen is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Noah Edwardsen
Speaker details