Speaker summary
92%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Warken results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 66 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,883 of 37,939 speakers). This Nina Warken is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Nina Warken
Speaker details